Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6:
'''Highly recommended suggestion: '''
Need to consider analogs and relations of this class of functions to the [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/KnuthUp-ArrowNotation.html| Knuth up-arrow notation], the corresponding logarithmically-based [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/DownArrowNotation.html| down-arrow notation], and the [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PowerTower.html| power towers] on ''MathWorld''. If nothing else, the use of these conventions can simplify the notation used to express the exponential factorial sequences defined here. Aren't there also cases where appropriate normalization (I'm thinking by something like the analog to the [[Barnes G-function]]) yields special constants? All of this needs to be added to make this a cohesive article.
:[[User:Multipotentialmike|Multipotentialmike]] ([[User talk:Multipotentialmike|talk]]) 08:41, 2 May 2018 (UTC) I would like to believe that [[User:Jddowney789|Jddowney789]] removed a 1 digit from the sum of reciprocals because he or she honestly believed that the calculation was incorrect. In that case, the calculation methodology has to be explained. I don't know how [[User:Anton Mravcek|Anton Mravcek]] did the calculation, but here is what I did to doublecheck it. Using [[Mathematica]], I defined the following:
| |||