Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 May 8: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Spleodrach (talk | contribs) |
→Loughs of Northern Ireland: ouch! |
||
Line 51:
::::# There is indeed an official body called the [http://www.loughs-agency.org Loughs Agency]. If you had taken 30 seconds to follow the link at the top of that page to http://www.loughs-agency.org/about-us/, then you have seen that there's an official body called the Loughs Agency which is responsible for 2 ''sea loughs'', rather than the ''freshwater lakes'' in these categories.<br> You could also have learnt that by reading the previous discussion to which I linked yesterday: [[:WP:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 April 7#Lakes_of_the_Republic_of_Ireland|CfD 2018 April 7#Lakes of the Republic of Ireland]].
::::It is disappointing to have to waste time refuting the falsehoods posted by an editor who chooses not to read linked policy, not to read a linked previous discussion, and not even to read a website which they cite in evidence. --[[User:BrownHairedGirl|<span style="color:#663200;">Brown</span><span style="display:inline-block;transform:rotate(-3deg)">Haired</span>Girl]] <small>[[User talk:BrownHairedGirl|(talk)]] • ([[Special:Contributions/BrownHairedGirl|contribs]])</small> 07:41, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
:::::Ouch! No need to be so aggressive. For "cherry picked examples" I think you actually mean "examples", which I've provided in contrast to you. It's no skin off my nose if the categories are renamed, but maybe you'd like to restore some credibility by finding sources that show the majority of people talke about "lakes" in Northern Ireland. [[User:Sionk|Sionk]] ([[User talk:Sionk|talk]]) 18:29, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
*'''Support''' – per nom. [[User:Spleodrach|Spleodrach]] ([[User talk:Spleodrach|talk]]) 11:58, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
| |||