Revision as of 08:03, 23 August 2017 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,769 edits m Signing comment by ShalokShalom - "→Pattern matching: new section" ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:07, 23 May 2018 edit undo Vanished user 2940192 (talk \| contribs) 241 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 5: Is this a reasonable category to have? Clean is specified as "No" because the base library does not use monads, but Scheme as "Yes" because someone implemented a single monad. It seems every language should be a "yes" here because they can implement it. [[Special:Contributions/98.3.24.49\|98.3.24.49]] ([[User talk:98.3.24.49\|talk]]) 23:53, 25 June 2017 (UTC) :I agree. I first edited to let Clean have "Yes" because there are libraries for that, then removed the columns. A more meaningful column would be "I/O method". For Haskell this is the I/O monad, for Clean uniqueness typing. [[User:CamilStaps\|CamilStaps]] ([[User talk:CamilStaps\|talk]]) 13:07, 23 May 2018 (UTC) == External links modified ==

Talk:Comparison of functional programming languages: Difference between revisions