Content deleted Content added
→Suggested change to the first digit-by-digit method example: Comments in answer |
|||
Line 380:
Also, mentioning that the '20' in '20p' is the product of the base, 10, and the root being sought, 2, may be another effective link to the related article, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shifting_nth_root_algorithm <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/137.118.149.208|137.118.149.208]] ([[User talk:137.118.149.208#top|talk]]) 21:22, 24 May 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Your suggestion in the first paragraph of your message seems to me to be a good one. Why don't you go ahead and replaced the example with a better one? I'm not so sure about "explicitly noting the values..." That may be a good idea, or it may just add more clutter and make the whole thing more confusing. I suppose to some extent it depends on how it is done. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "[[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]]" ([[User talk:JamesBWatson#top|talk]]) 15:58, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
|