Content deleted Content added
m v1.43 - WP:WCW project (Math tag without correct match - Spelling and typography) |
→Properties: Changed first section title from discussion and changed the proposition, proof sections of the section to fit more of a Wikipedia tone. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 3:
As with complex and real analysis, it is possible to study the concepts of [[analytic function|analyticity]], [[holomorphic function|holomorphy]], [[harmonic function|harmonicity]] and [[conformality]] in the context of quaternions. It is known that for the complex numbers, these four notions coincide; however, for the quaternions, and also the real numbers, not all of the notions are the same.
==
The [[projection (linear algebra)|projections]] of a quaternion onto its scalar part or onto its vector part, as well as the modulus and [[versor]] functions, are examples that are basic to understanding quaternion structure.
Line 18:
Quaternion variable theory differs in some respects from complex variable theory. For example: The [[complex conjugate]] mapping of the complex plane is a central tool but requires the introduction of a non-arithmetic, [[Holomorphic function|non-analytic]] operation. Indeed, conjugation changes the [[orientation (mathematics)|orientation]] of plane figures, something that arithmetic functions do not change.
In contrast to the [[complex conjugate]], the quaternion conjugation can be expressed arithmetically
This can be proven by taking the basis elements. With them, we have
:<math>f_4(1) = -\tfrac{1}{2}(1 - 1 - 1 - 1) = 1, \quad
f_4(i) = -\tfrac{1}{2}(i - i + i + i) = -i, \quad
Line 35 ⟶ 33:
Though <math>\mathbb{H}</math> [[quaternion#H as a union of complex planes|appears as a union of complex planes]], the following proposition shows that extending complex functions requires special care:
▲'''Proof''': Let <math>r^*</math> represent the conjugate of <math>r</math>, so that <math>q = x - yr^*</math>. The extension to <math>\mathbb{H}</math> will be complete when it is shown that <math>f_5(q) = f_5(x - yr^*)</math>. Indeed, by hypothesis
▲:<math>u(x,y) = u(x,-y), \quad v(x,y) = -v(x,-y) \quad</math> so that one obtains
:<math>f_5(x - y r^*) = u(x,-y) + r^* v(x,-y) = u(x,y) + r v(x,y) = f_5(q).</math>
|