Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2018/May: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Perfumers: unsigned |
m →Perfumers: comment |
||
Line 13:
*{{tl|Perfumer-bio-stub}}<small>Aug 2008</small>(s1 61 transclusions) <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:RevengeOfTheRobots|RevengeOfTheRobots]] ([[User talk:RevengeOfTheRobots#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/RevengeOfTheRobots|contribs]]) 01:40, 1 June 2018 (UTC)</small>
:I don't think this template is needed. There are only 61 total perfumers with articles in [[:Category:Perfumers]], and based on random sampling, it looks like less than half of these are stubs. We generally do not create stub templates with so little potential for growth. Perfumers are currently being sorted using {{tl|fashion-bio-stub}} which is not oversized. --[[User:Qetuth|Qetuth]] ([[User talk:Qetuth|talk]]) 08:49, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
:Looking at the history of the "to create" page, I see that this template was added to the "arts" list by [[User:RevengeOfTheRobots|RevengeOfTheRobots]], along with a false date (this was never discussed as far as I can find). I'm guessing that the user realized that this Proposals page was the correct place to request the template and then moved it here. (Though I'm a bit suspicious of the "Aug 2008" date cited. Hmm.) Anyway, we definitely don't need a stub type for this subject, per RR's comment about viability. '''Do not create'''. [[User:Pegship|Pegship]] ([[User talk:Pegship|talk]]) 17:17, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
===Australian people stubs===
| |||