Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multimodel Deep Learning: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:27, 10 June 2018

Revision as of 19:50, 11 June 2018

Line 5:

:{{la|Multimodel Deep Learning}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multimodel Deep Learning|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 June 10#{{anchorencode:Multimodel Deep Learning}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Multimodel_Deep_Learning Stats]</span>)

:({{Find sources AFD|Multimodel Deep Learning}})

"Random Multimodel Deep Learning" is an article based solely on the work of Kowsari, Kamran (first reference). All other references are not on "multimodel deep learning". The Kowsari work has 0 citations, and was just published. This clearly fails the [[WP:GNG]], and thus I opt for '''delete'''. Do not let yourself be mislead by all the unrelated "references" in the wikipedia article. There is a link to Theano, but Theano does not include RMDL. Similarly, the "history" section explains what "ensemble learning" and "deep learning" are, not RMDL - wiki references 2-6 are not based on, or using RMDL, but older prior work that does not support this article. [[User:HelpUsStopSpam|HelpUsStopSpam]] ([[User talk:HelpUsStopSpam|talk]]) 11:30, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' Some of the concerns raised by the nom are valid. Some aren't. The Kowsari work has 56 references, inline citations are not necessarily required, but are present anyway. The other issues of not mentioning RMDL are somewhat a non-issue. The article doesn't claim them as supporting RMDL, they're in the history section. Other !voters don't need to dive into those references, it's fairly clear that this article only cites one source. The nom is right about failure of [[WP:GNG|GNG]], and the whole article reeks of [[WP:OR|OR]]. Kill it with <s>fire</s> adminium. [[User:Bellezzasolo|<span style="color: #bb9900">&#x2230;</span><span style="color: #00326a">'''Bellezzasolo'''</span><span style="color: #bb9900">&#x2721;</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Bellezzasolo|<small>Discuss</small>]] 12:40, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Mark the train|<span style="font-family:Forte">MT Train</span>]]^{[[User talk:Mark the train|<span style="font-family:Segoe script">''Talk''</span>]]} 17:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)</small>

:: I didn't say anything about the references (56 or not) in his publication? I noted that RMDL is not ''cited'' independently. The reason why I emphasized this is because people tend to defend articles by "but it is full of references"; but if they only reference prerequisites, not the notability of the article subject, one has to carefully check which wikirefs matter for judging GNG. This in particular applies for the link to Theano - this easily gives the false impression, RMDL would be in Theano. But it isn't. [[User:HelpUsStopSpam|HelpUsStopSpam]] ([[User talk:HelpUsStopSpam|talk]]) 19:50, 11 June 2018 (UTC)