Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multimodel Deep Learning: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Mark viking (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 12:
:: I didn't say anything about the references (56 or not) in his publication? I noted that RMDL is not ''cited'' independently. The reason why I emphasized this is because people tend to defend articles by "but it is full of references"; but if they only reference prerequisites, not the notability of the article subject, one has to carefully check which wikirefs matter for judging GNG. This in particular applies for the link to Theano - this easily gives the false impression, RMDL would be in Theano. But it isn't. [[User:HelpUsStopSpam|HelpUsStopSpam]] ([[User talk:HelpUsStopSpam|talk]]) 19:50, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
: I pruned all the generic "deep learning" references and further reading to make it a bit clearer, and to make the article more focused (no need to re-tell the story of deep learning). So if anyone get into this discussion at a later point, and is wondering what "other" references I talked about. [[User:HelpUsStopSpam|HelpUsStopSpam]] ([[User talk:HelpUsStopSpam|talk]]) 19:57, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' This article is primarily based on a new arxiv paper that is not yet published. I was unable to find any reliable sources about RMDL, much less independent RS. Without independent reliable sources, there can be no verification and should be no article. --[[User:Mark viking|Mark viking]] ([[User talk:Mark viking|talk]]) 23:51, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
| |||