Revision as of 14:01, 11 July 2018 edit Matthiaspaul (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 137,884 edits →Performance: changed embedded EL into ref ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:55, 15 July 2018 edit undo Matthiaspaul (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 137,884 edits →Performance: Removed a sentence that does not make sense. Next edit →
Line 102: ==Performance== A binary encoding is inherently less efficient for conversions to or from decimal-encoded data, such as strings ([[ASCII]], [[Unicode]], etc.) and [[Binary-coded decimal\|BCD]]. A binary encoding is therefore best chosen only when the data are binary rather than decimal. IBM has published some unverified performance data,.<ref>http://speleotrove.com/decimal/decperf.html</ref> ~~however as both packages are available as open-source these figures could not be verified independently~~. ==See also==

Binary integer decimal: Difference between revisions