Sense and reference: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
copy edit wound up misstating Frege
m Took out "what *we* now call"
Line 8:
#The sense of different names is different, even when their reference is the same. Frege argued that if an identity statement such as "[[Hesperus]] is the same planet as [[Phosphorus (morning star)|Phosphorus]]" is to be informative, the proper names flanking the identity sign must have a different meaning or sense. But clearly, if the statement is true, they must have the same reference.<ref>"On Sense and Reference", p. 25</ref> The sense is a 'mode of presentation', which serves to illuminate only a single aspect of the referent.<ref>"On Sense and Reference", p. 27</ref>
 
Much of [[analytic philosophy]] is traceable to Frege's philosophy of language.<ref name=Speaks>Jeff Speaks, [https://www3.nd.edu/~jspeaks/courses/2011-12/83104/handouts/frege-reference.pdf "Frege's theory of reference"] (2011)</ref> Frege's views on logic (i.e., his idea that some parts of speech are complete by themselves, and are analogous to the [[Argument of a function|arguments]] of a [[Function (mathematics)|mathematical function]]) led to his views abouton what we now calla '''theory of reference'''<!--boldface per WP:R#PLA-->.<ref name=Speaks/>
 
==Background==