Revision as of 00:02, 27 July 2018 edit 50.35.103.217 (talk) →Other sites ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:03, 27 July 2018 edit undo 50.35.103.217 (talk) →Other sites Next edit →
Line 15: ::::The essay looks otherwise fairly complete to me now, so perhaps we could just add a short list of definitely useful sites for now. [[User:Charles Matthews\|Charles Matthews]] ([[User talk:Charles Matthews\|talk]]) 19:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC) :Stackexhange and its variants are a joke of a site. People dont get help there. These sites are mostly for the weak-ego'ed to find validation in their pseudo-contributions. Personally Ive never had a decent answer given to me satisfying a question. Not once. I do get platitudes and naive answers from people who dont understand the question. Or trivial and degenerate solutions, or non-answer commentary. But mostly I get people being patronizing and mocking the question. If the question is hard to answer, they will usually accuse you of cheating. And if ~~they~~the question is easy, they jump on it all too easily to win easy points with the community. ~~Locks~~Lots of mocking. Lots of pretentiousness. And this isnt just my opinion. Its the opinion of many people I know, both student and faculty, at the University. Math majors and their math doctorate-holding professors all think the stackexchange network is an utter waste of time. [[Special:Contributions/50.35.103.217\|50.35.103.217]] ([[User talk:50.35.103.217\|talk]]) 00:01, 27 July 2018 (UTC) == Categorising what we are doing here ==

Help talk:Using Wikipedia for mathematics self-study: Difference between revisions