Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algorithms (journal): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Updating nomination page with notices (assisted) |
Randykitty (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 10:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Mathematics|list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Kpgjhpjm|<span style="color: turquoise ">Kpgj</span>]][[User talk:Kpgjhpjm|<span style="color: red">hpjm</span>]] 04:07, 30 July 2018 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Kpgjhpjm|<span style="color: turquoise ">Kpgj</span>]][[User talk:Kpgjhpjm|<span style="color: red">hpjm</span>]] 04:07, 30 July 2018 (UTC)</small>
*'''Weak keep'''. As our article on [[MDPI]] documents, it was indeed listed by Beall as a predatory publisher, but then removed from his list (long before he was forced to close that down). In addition, the journal is [https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/21100199795 listed in Scopus], which we generally accept as evidence of notability in these discussions. As that's the only claim to fame, however, I only !vote "weak keep". --[[User:Randykitty|Randykitty]] ([[User talk:Randykitty|talk]]) 07:56, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
| |||