Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algorithms (journal): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:17, 30 July 2018

Revision as of 17:16, 30 July 2018

Line 12:

*'''Weak keep'''. As our article on [[MDPI]] documents, it was indeed listed by Beall as a predatory publisher, but then removed from his list (long before he was forced to close that down). In addition, the journal is [https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/21100199795 listed in Scopus], which we generally accept as evidence of notability in these discussions. As that's the only claim to fame, however, I only !vote "weak keep". --[[User:Randykitty|Randykitty]] ([[User talk:Randykitty|talk]]) 07:56, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

*'''Keep'''. As http://www.mdpi.com/search?q=&journal=algorithms&sort=article_citedby&page_count=50 shows, quite a number of widely cited papers have appeared in this journal. Therefore quite a number of readers might be interested to look up what kind of journal this is. -- [[User:Nsda|Nsda]] ([[User talk:Nsda|talk]]) 08:17, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

::{{ping|Nsda}} But they can just go to the journal's website. Also, how can we say what kind of journal it is when we don't have independent verification? [[User:RileyBugz|<span style="color:#2D3D67">RileyBugz</span>]]^{[[User talk:RileyBugz|<span style="color:#D7000B">私に叫ぼう</span>]]}_{[[Special:Contributions/RileyBugz|<span style="color:#D7000B">私の編集</span>]]} 17:16, 30 July 2018 (UTC)