Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algorithms (journal): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Scope creep (talk | contribs) Keep |
JC7V7DC5768 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 14:
::{{ping|Nsda}} But they can just go to the journal's website. Also, how can we say what kind of journal it is when we don't have independent verification? [[User:RileyBugz|<span style="color:#2D3D67">RileyBugz</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:RileyBugz|<span style="color:#D7000B">私に叫ぼう</span>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/RileyBugz|<span style="color:#D7000B">私の編集</span>]]</sub> 17:16, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', indexed in Scopus and both zbMATH and MathSciNet, and it's [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22Algorithms%22+MDPI&btnG= reasonably cited] so that passes [[WP:NJOURNALS]]. MDPI is certainly a questionable publisher, but they're no [[OMICS Publishing Group]]. All in all, we're better off with this article than without. <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">[[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] {[[User talk:Headbomb|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|c]] · [[WP:PHYS|p]] · [[WP:WBOOKS|b]]}</span> 01:49, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' I agree. [[User:Scope creep|scope_creep]] ([[User talk:Scope creep|talk]]) 08:27, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' agree with the other keeps, Algorithms is adequately cited, meets WP:NJournals and meets WP:GNG (even if not with flying colors). [[User:JC7V7DC5768|<em style="font-family:Rubik;color:Lollipop">JC7V</em>]]<small>[[User talk:JC7V7DC5768|'''<em style="font-family:Ebrima;color:Purple">-constructive zone</em>''']]</small> 21:49, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
| |||