Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Candidate statements/Questions for UninvitedCompany: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 03:19, 2 November 2006

Revision as of 18:56, 2 November 2006

Line 66:

==Additional Questions==

# As functions assigned by ArbCom, describe your view on the assignments of [[Wikipedia:Oversight|Oversight]] and [[meta:Checkuser|Checkuser]] permissions, including thresholds for (or even the possibility of) new applicants. <small>(Question from — [[User:Xaosflux|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype"><big>xaosflux</big></font></b>]] ^{[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]} 03:19, 2 November 2006 (UTC))</small>

==Questions from [[User:Wizardry_Dragon|Wizardry Dragon]]==

I have a few questions I wish to ask:

* You mention that you feel that the [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] has been to lenient on trouble users. How so?

:# How so?

:# Take a case you feel is a case in point. How would you have done things differently?

:# How would you deal with problem users in general, remembering to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]]?

* You have been on the [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] in the past.

:# How did you find your experience as an Arbitrator?

:# What would you consider the defining, or most positive moment, as an Arbitrator?

:# What would you consider the low point, or least positive moment, as an Arbitrator?

:# What would you have done differently?

Thanks for your time, and good luck with the coming elections.