Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algorithms (journal): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
JC7V7DC5768 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 17:
*'''Keep''' agree with the other keeps, Algorithms is adequately cited, meets WP:NJournals and meets WP:GNG (even if not with flying colors). [[User:JC7V7DC5768|<em style="font-family:Rubik;color:Lollipop">JC7V</em>]]<small>[[User talk:JC7V7DC5768|'''<em style="font-family:Ebrima;color:Purple">-constructive zone</em>''']]</small> 21:49, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
::{{ping|JC7V7DC5768}} How does it meet GNG? I can't find any significant coverage, a requirement of it. [[User:RileyBugz|<span style="color:#2D3D67">RileyBugz</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:RileyBugz|<span style="color:#D7000B">私に叫ぼう</span>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/RileyBugz|<span style="color:#D7000B">私の編集</span>]]</sub> 22:41, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
:::{{ping|RileyBugz}}}, From reading the WP:GNG and the other discussions I realized that it is a keep because of the indexing in Scopus (which meets 1B in WP:NJournals) and because of MathsciNet indexing plus searching in Google Scholar made me realize the article belongs here.[[User:JC7V7DC5768|<em style="font-family:Rubik;color:Lollipop">JC7V</em>]]<small>[[User talk:JC7V7DC5768|'''<em style="font-family:Ebrima;color:Purple">-constructive zone</em>''']]</small> 01:34, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
|