Content deleted Content added
→Comments: Added missing ref |
No edit summary |
||
Line 35:
* "Cantor's article is short, not even four and a half pages" — Can we trim this to "Cantor's article is under five pages long" or "Cantor's article is roughly four and a half pages"?
*<s>"It begins with a discussion of the real algebraic numbers" — Would "definition" be better than "discussion"?</s>
*<s>"Cantor restates this theorem in terms more familiar to mathematicians of his time" — This seems to be a stronger claim than is verified by the paper itself (or its English translation).</s>
*<s>"The first part of this theorem implies the "Hence" part ..." — Agreed, but Cantor doesn't describe this in the article, right? Or am I missing the point/context of this paragraph?</s>
Line 84:
::Thanks! <span class="nowrap">— '''[[User:Bilorv|Bilorv]]'''<sub>[[Special:Contribs/Bilorv|(c)]][[User talk:Bilorv|('''talk''')]]</sub></span> 21:06, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
: Concerning "Cantor restates this theorem...": Moved existing reference; added missing reference. —[[User:RJGray|RJGray]] ([[User talk:RJGray|talk]]) 21:44, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
::Excellent. <span class="nowrap">— '''[[User:Bilorv|Bilorv]]'''<sub>[[Special:Contribs/Bilorv|(c)]][[User talk:Bilorv|('''talk''')]]</sub></span> 22:56, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
| |||