Revision as of 23:11, 2 November 2006 edit Thatcher (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 28,287 edits forking		Revision as of 01:36, 3 November 2006 edit undo Metamagician3000 (talk \| contribs) Administrators 10,965 edits →Editorial judgement Next edit →
Line 1: ===Edit warring considered harmful=== 1) [[Edit warring]] is considered harmful. When disagreements arise, users are expected to discuss their differences rationally rather than reverting ad infinitum. The [[three-revert rule]] should not be construed as an entitlement or inalienable right to three reverts, nor does it endorse reverts as an editing technique. Line 1,042 ⟶ 1,041: :Comment by others: ::Absolutely right. It sums up well the problem I often see of people using a tunnel-vision, literal-minded interpretation of policy to defeat good judgment and common sense. [[User:Metamagician3000\|Metamagician3000]] 01:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC) :: ===Template===

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience/Workshop/Proposed Principles: Difference between revisions