Content deleted Content added
→Comments: The proofs |
No edit summary |
||
Line 125:
:The example of Cantor's construction is another "illustrative example" with the additional feature of being able to be verified by doing some calculations. — [[User:RJGray|RJGray]] ([[User talk:RJGray|talk]]) 16:12, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
::I retract the comment about the table and the closed intervals.
::Can you describe to me how the [[Georg Cantor%27s first set theory article#Example of Cantor's construction|Example of Cantor's construction]] was written? If you mean to say that you claim the entire section falls under [[WP:SCG]], then I'll have to take a closer look and research into what the standard is in this area. I wouldn't describe it as a "simple derivation" or a "routine calculation", not due to complexity but due to the length of the section. The table is trivial, but not the proof of {{nowrap|''x<sub>i</sub>'' ∉ (''a<sub>n</sub>'', ''b<sub>n</sub>'')}}. But then, surely there's a source which covers this step that Cantor omitted. <span class="nowrap">— '''[[User:Bilorv|Bilorv]]'''<sub>[[Special:Contribs/Bilorv|(c)]][[User talk:Bilorv|('''talk''')]]</sub></span> 18:58, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
| |||