Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algorithms (journal): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Enterprisey (talk | contribs) →Algorithms (journal): Replying to AfD nomination by RileyBugz (reply-link) |
Aaronw1109 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 32:
*'''Weak Keep''' I'd prefer to see this deleted based on the paucity of sourcing, however, by my reading of the standards of NJOURNAL (the journal being indexed in Scopus) I am, regrettably, compelled to !vote Keep. Though, if there's a question about the veracity or - indeed - existence of its peer review process I feel like we can probably edit that away. [[User:Chetsford|Chetsford]] ([[User talk:Chetsford|talk]]) 22:05, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
* '''Weak keep''' as it seems to pass the notability guideline for journals. [[User:Enterprisey|Enterprisey]] ([[User talk:Enterprisey|talk!]]) 02:31, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
* '''Weak Keep''' per previous two comments. The article most definitely needs more information added to it, but it still appears to be notable. [[User:Redditaddict69|<b style="color:#3399FF">Redditaddict</b>]][[User talk:Redditaddict69|<b style="color:#339900">_6_</b>]][[Special:Contributions/Redditaddict69|<b style="color:#3399FF">9</b>]] 05:01, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
| |||