Revision as of 03:21, 4 November 2006 edit K (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 22,767 edits →Suspected misquote of source ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:34, 4 November 2006 edit undo Cognita (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 899 edits Confused Next edit →
Line 1,266: [[User:Cognita\|Cognita]] 03:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC) ::The grammatical error is an accurate rendering of the cited text. I've replaced the words "that they are" with " ... " . ... [[User:Kenosis\|Kenosis]] 03:20, 4 November 2006 (UTC) == Confused == Thanks, Kenosis! Today my talk page has this unsigned message: "Claiming that the removal of an entire section is "more small grammatical stuff" [1] is vandalism see WP:VAND." This is harsh. I'm not a vandal, and I certainly didn't mean to remove any sections. I was making tiny changes to clean up the presentation--nothing that would alter the meaning. The page I was directed to shows that what I submitted ends in the middle of a word. I don't know how the text that followed it disappeared. A real vandal who wanted to delete a section would have done it more neatly. I've seen a guideline "Assume good faith," but it wasn't followed in this case. [[User:Cognita\|Cognita]] 17:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Intelligent design: Difference between revisions