Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science and technology: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Science and technology]]: comment |
|||
Line 12:
*'''Keep''' (also for now). The article is not to explain the term "science" and the term "technology." It is for the term "science and technology" which takes on a meaning other than the sum of its two parts. I am the first to admit that the article in its current state is weak. However, I am not the right person to write the final article and it was my intent to put a clean-up tag on the article but I did not move fast enough and the speedy delete tag was up before I found my tag. It may turn out that nobody is able to bring this up to the desired standard, but at least give the article a couple of months to show where it can go. Cheers -- [[User:MCG|MCG]] 14:11, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''delete''' the article does not establish any insight of merit that is not found in the primary and secondary articles on science and technology already. This is not to say that it couldn't do that, but that it does not right now. --[[User:Buridan|Buridan]] 14:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
:*'''Comment''' If there is merit, why delete it as opposed to fix it? It has been pointed out that there are several articles incorporating this term (which is more than its two parts). Additionally there are categories that do this as well; in a quick search I can find [[:Category:Science and technology by country]] (and this is full of many other sub categories of science and technology) and [[:Category:Science and technology studies]]. If you delete the article Science and technology, it will eventually be re-created. Why not deal with the content of the article now instead of later? -- [[User:MCG|MCG]] 14:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
| |||