Content deleted Content added
FWBOarticle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
FWBOarticle (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 48:
:Amateur does not mean untrained, it means not professional. She was a historian because she is known for writing books about history (plural). [[User:Markalexander100|Mark]][[User talk:Markalexander100|<sup>1</sup>]] 00:46, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
The fact that chang wrote several books on (Chinese, Japanese or American) history doesn't change anything about her lack of traning as a historian. And as you should be aware of wikipedia policy, you can't censor a fact. I should also point out that it is your insistence of calling her a "historian" which brought this mud slinging. As the term "historian" has implication that someone is a academic, it is necessarly to clarify the fact that she is a historian but not trained/academic historian. "The best selling author of history of Naking Massacre" would have avoided all the confusion which the term historian would have caused. I will still settle for "the author" but if you want to stick to "historian but not trained one" be my guest.
| |||