Revision as of 21:46, 22 September 2018 edit Daniel.ruepp (talk \| contribs) 271 edits m →Why ISO13790 is not considered as "simulation" ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:37, 25 September 2018 edit undo Daniel.ruepp (talk \| contribs) 271 edits m →Why ISO13790 is not considered as "simulation" Next edit →
Line 42: == Why ISO13790 is not considered as "simulation" == Scientific literature mostly refer to ISO 13790 as "calculation" and not "simulation". There are several limitations in this standard, especially the use of simplified algebraic equations and "utilization factors" are the main reason why it is not considered as "simulation~~", but "calculation~~". * The ISO 13790 standard uses simple algebraic equations, while dynamic simulation is focused on transient behavior of systems and buildings.<ref>{{cite journal \|last1=Kim \|first1=Young-Jin \|last2=Yoon \|first2=Seong-Hwan \|last3=Park \|first3=Cheol-Soo \|title=Stochastic comparison between simplified energy calculation and dynamic simulation \|journal=Energy and Buildings \|date=September 2013 \|volume=64 \|pages=332–342 \|doi=10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.05.026}}</ref>

Talk:Building performance simulation: Difference between revisions