|
:This topic is extremely broad, and has significance beyond just popularization, since "popular science" can and does influence professional science at times. I don't think "criteria of good and bad popular science" is appropriate, but there is a lot that could be done.--[[User:Ragesoss|ragesoss]] 21:33, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
===[[Alzheimer's disease]]===
====(2 votes), stays until [[October 2]]====
:''Nominated <u>[[September 25]]</u>, needs 2 votes by [[October 2]].''
;Support
#[[User:Chrispounds|Chrispounds]] 18:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
#[[User:Dr.alf|dr.alf]] 04:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
;Comments
On November 3, 1906, Alzheimer's disease was mentioned by Alois Alzheimer's in a lecture in Germany. I am campaigning to get it to Feature article status for November 3, 2006. The article is already fairly good, but it is much stronger on the clinical side compared to the molecular and disease process side. Nature Medicine July 2006 had a great set of articles that could be sources for an update. --[[User:Chrispounds|Chrispounds]] 18:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
*This article was a medical collaboration not too long ago iirc. - [[User:Samsara|{{{2|Samsara}}}]] ([[User talk:Samsara|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Samsara|contribs]]) 23:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
*Long enough already. The SCOTM should give way to article more desperately needing collaboration. --[[User:Deryck Chan|Der]][[User talk:Deryck Chan|yck C.]] 05:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
===[[Gene]]===
| 