Admiralty code: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:50, 17 December 2017

Revision as of 16:09, 25 September 2018

Line 1:

{{onesource|date=November 2009}}

The '''Admiralty System''' or '''NATO System''' is a method for evaluating collected items of [[Intelligence (information gathering)| intelligence]]. <ref>{{Citation

| last = [[Ministry of Defence (United Kingdom)]]

| first =

Line 27:

==Evaluation==

Evaluation occurs in the processing stage of the intelligence cycle recognising that collected information cannot be accepted at face value. Each item of information used in the creation of an assessment is given an indication of source reliability and assessed accuracy, based on corroboration or other assessment. Each descriptor is considered in isolation to ensure that the reliability of the source does not influence the assessed accuracy of the report.

==Reliability==

A source is assessed for reliability based on a technical assessment of its capability, or in the case of [[HUMINT| Human Intelligence sources]] their history. Notation uses Alpha coding, A-F:

*Reliability of Source <ref>FM 2-22 https://fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm2-22-3.pdf</ref>

:A - Completely reliable: No doubt of authenticity, trustworthiness, or competency; has a history of complete reliability

:B - Usually reliable: Minor doubt about authenticity, trustworthiness, or competency; has a history of valid information most of the time

Line 43 ⟶ 41:

==Credibility==

An item is assessed for credibility based on likelihood and levels of corroboration by other sources. Notation uses a numeric code, 1-6.

*Accuracy of data <ref>FM 2-22 https://fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm2-22-3.pdf</ref>

:1 - Confirmed by other sources: Confirmed by other independent sources; logical in itself; Consistent with other information on the subject

:2 - Probably True: Not confirmed; logical in itself; consistent with other information on the subject

Line 55 ⟶ 52:

==Reporting==

An assessment will provide a candidate course of action based on the coding of the items of collected information used to compile the assessment. The [[hypothesis]] will not be coded but the wording will caveat conclusions based on the levels of confidence indicated by the code.