Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2018 CUOS appointments/CU: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:25, 25 September 2018

Revision as of 19:02, 25 September 2018

Line 102:

*'''Support''' experienced admin who looks at the bigger picture. [[User:Son of Kolachi|Son of Kolachi]] ([[User talk:Son of Kolachi|talk]]) 05:52, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

*'''Oppose'''. It surprises me to see this application from Ivanvector here because of the kind of stunts he's been pulling of late. His conduct in recent months has been totally appalling. As per my reading of the oppose comments above and my personal observation: he has a) frequently feuded with a number of editors, b) acquitted (or attempted to acquit) long term abusers such as NadirAli and Nauriya by engaging in falsification of facts, and proxy abusing socks like StLouis2, c) protected pages and acted as an SPI admin clerk where he's [[WP:INVOLVED]], d) frequently engaged in [[WP:NPA]] by casting aspersions on fellow editors (for example, as mentioned by User:Desmay, calling User:DBigXray an "'''obvious meatpuppet'''" without even a shred of evidence[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=859382771]). All of this has happened before this appointment process began. These are significant misconduct issues, and make me believe that this candidate cannot be trusted with a permission like CheckUser at all. Finally, their own comments here gives the impression that they are far from having a fair understanding about policies such as clean start and wheel warring. [[User:Bharatiya29|<font color="#FF9933">Bharatiya</font>]][[User talk:Bharatiya29|<font color="#138808">29</font>]] 18:25, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

*'''Support''' as entirely trustworthy. The opposing comments look to me like grudges that happen when an admin has been around long enough. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 19:02, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

==== SQL (CU) ====