Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2018 CUOS appointments/CU: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comments: Support |
s |
||
Line 206:
*'''Neutral'''. A good rationale for requesting the permission, but not much recent experience with the editing community. On a broader note, I think I'm seeing a pattern where highly active candidates attract opposes because they've been highly visible, whereas a candidate who has had little attention, as here, gets easy supports. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 19:07, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
*'''Support''': Having worked with stwalkerster at ACC and on IRC for several years, I'm convinced that their technical ability is far above the threshold required for competently and correctly performing CU operations and evaluating the results. They also clearly understand the responsibility involved, and possess the demeanor and respect for the community and have the ability to respectfully work with others to resolve concerns. There's no question in my mind that they are an excellent candidate. [[User:Waggie|Waggie]] ([[User talk:Waggie|talk]]) 03:07, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
*'''Support''': clear need for the tool. <u style="font:1.1em/1em Arial Black">[[User:Flooded with them hundreds|<u style="color:#7f2ed1">Flooded </u>]]<u style="color:#bfa6d8"><small>with them </small></u>[[User_talk:Flooded with them hundreds|<u style="color:#7f2ed1">'''hundreds'''</u>]]</u> 09:48, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
==== TonyBallioni (CU) ====
|