Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2018 CUOS appointments/CU: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comments: oppose |
GreenMeansGo (talk | contribs) →Comments: s |
||
Line 393:
*'''Support''': Having worked with Oshwah in many areas of the project, it is clear to me that they are strongly motivated to protect Wikipedia and has the clear technical competence to do it extremely well as a CU. They collaborate extremely well with others, even when in disagreement, and clearly have the demeanor and respect for the community to be deserving of the responsibility. When I was working with Oshwah to get started at ACC, Oshwah taught me how critical it is to respect the responsibility being handed to ACCers with the sensitive information handled there. [[User:Waggie|Waggie]] ([[User talk:Waggie|talk]]) 03:11, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. The opposers are unconvincing, Oshwah is probably the only most active admin in the anti-vandalism area and the CU tool may assist him further in dealing with sockpuppets. His SPI traineeship with DoRD is a commendable headstart. <u style="font:1.1em/1em Arial Black">[[User:Flooded with them hundreds|<u style="color:#7f2ed1">Flooded </u>]]<u style="color:#bfa6d8"><small>with them </small></u>[[User_talk:Flooded with them hundreds|<u style="color:#7f2ed1">'''hundreds'''</u>]]</u> 10:02, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
*'''Support''' - All respect to the opposers, but I've always found Oshwah to be, if anything, helpful to a fault, but that's a fault that mostly just takes up his own time and patience. I have no doubt he has the required technical expertise. [[User:GreenMeansGo|<span style="font-family:Impact"><span style="color:#07CB4B">G</span><span style="color:#449351">M</span><span style="color:#35683d">G</span></span>]][[User talk:GreenMeansGo#top|<sup style="color:#000;font-family:Impact">talk</sup>]] 23:08, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
| |||