ACM Transactions on Database Systems: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:30, 18 September 2018

Revision as of 22:39, 27 September 2018

Line 29:

ACM TODS received the highest possible ranking, “A*”, in the CORE rankings of computer science journals and conferences.<ref>{{cite web

| title = Journal Rankings

| date = February 2010

| work = CORE: The Computing Research and Education Association of Australasia

| accessdate = 2010-04-29

| url = http://core.edu.au/index.php/categories/journals/12

| archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20100505045054/http://core.edu.au/index.php/categories/journals/12
| archivedate = 5 May 2010 <!-05-DASHBot-->05
| deadurl = yes
|df = no
}}</ref> In a study of citation patterns for database publication venues, TODS had the highest long-term impact, as measured by the frequency of citations to its papers, among any of the venues studied; however, most of those citations were outside the two-year window in which the [[impact factor]] is conventionally measured. Although its short-term impact factor was the highest among the journals included in the study, it was lower than that of several database conferences.<ref>{{citation

| last1 = Yan | first1 = Su

| last2 = Lee | first2 = Dongwon