Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2018 CUOS appointments/CU: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comments: o |
closed |
||
Line 1:
{{archive top| result=The community consultation phase is closed. <span style="color: #9932CC">[[:User:KrakatoaKatie|Katie]]<sup>[[User talk:KrakatoaKatie|talk]]</sup></span> 00:10, 29 September 2018 (UTC) }}
==== Ivanvector (CU) ====
{{admin|Ivanvector}}
Line 411 ⟶ 412:
*'''Support''' Oshwah would make a good CU , but he should be a bit careful with his blocks as pointed out by Ritchie333 especially the one involving Tony1 . [[User:Kpgjhpjm|<span style="color: turquoise">Kpg</span>]][[User talk:Kpgjhpjm|<span style="color: red">jhp</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Kpgjhpjm|<span style="color:green">jm </span>]] 16:53, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' per Ritchie, Mistakes can and do happen with normal blocking (like the case with Tony and now like the case with the Congress blocking) but I feel with CU there is no room for mistakes and I'm afraid mistakes will happen I guess so regrettably I have to Oppose, We all make mistakes it happens but a lot of care has to be taken with CU, Anyway oppose. –[[User:Davey2010|<span style="color: blue;">'''Davey'''</span><span style="color: orange;">'''2010'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Davey2010|<span style="color: navy;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> 21:47, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
{{archive bottom}}
| |||