Content deleted Content added
OrangUtanUK (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 143:
: The merging work was undone by [[User:taw]]. See the history pages. I'm not particularly concerned whether there is a separate page for Oberon and Oberon-2 (as for Modula and Modula-2), or whether the pages are merged together. But the 'Oberon-1' terminology HAS to go. [[User:Chris Burrows|Chris Burrows]] 22:51, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
:: I favour combining the two articles. It was me that merged them - the discussion pages seemed to agree that was the right way to go. [[User:taw]] didn't discuss his un-merging before he went ahead with it. I would like to make the following observations:
:: * Oberon(-1) and Oberon-2 are both known as Oberon. Oberon(-1) is no longer interesting, and needs only a historical footnote.
:: * The example code on the Oberon-1 page is actually Oberon-2.
:: * a reader wishing to understand Oberon-2 would need to refer back to the Oberon-1 page as well.
:: [[User:OrangUtanUK|OrangUtanUK]] 14:53, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
| |||