Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercury Mail Transport System: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Speedy keep |
Cmt |
||
Line 10:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Editor-1|Editor-1]] ([[User talk:Editor-1|talk]]) 07:07, 15 October 2018 (UTC)</small>
* '''Merge''' into [[David Harris (software developer)]] - not significant enough for a stand alone article. [[User:NealeFamily|NealeFamily]] ([[User talk:NealeFamily|talk]]) 09:39, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
:* Be aware that that article too is up for deletion, unfortunately in some ways not part of that this as a [[WP:BUNDLE]]. You may wish to also explore the the other merge target I have suggested below.[[User:Djm-leighpark|Djm-leighpark]] ([[User talk:Djm-leighpark|talk]]) 09:59, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
* '''Speedy keep''' [[WP:ATD]] as part of [[WP:BEFORE]] should have meant either the article was tagged or the merge of this MTA into the sister MUA [[Peagus Mail]], but with the keep tagging for issues and optionally a merge proposal which can be sorted outside of AfD which is what is meant to happen. MTA entanglements are not my favourite pastime, MUAs being more use visible, but if this Mercury MTA relates to the mercury MTA at [[XAMPP]] then it probably should retain own article status. The harm caused by this article is minimal, the disruption to do a full investigation at AfD is significant and the timing is forced, and a proposal of a Merge in AfD requires the commitmnet to complete the merge promptly after AfD. However while I propose a speedy keep I am aware the conditions are unlikely to have been deemed to be met. I would therefore fallback to a keep with tagging and at worst a merge to [[Peagus Mail]] however I am not in good faith able to give a 100% commitment I would complete the merge in that circumstance ... it is perhaps 60% chance I would complete it promptly. (Edit conflict | |||