Revision as of 23:10, 26 October 2018 edit Tomhallward (talk \| contribs) 39 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:13, 26 October 2018 edit undo Tomhallward (talk \| contribs) 39 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 132: I also highly urge that Euler's notation should be inroduced and the concepts be developed using it.--[[User:Gustav Ulsh Iler\|Gustav Ulsh Iler]] ([[User talk:Gustav Ulsh Iler\|talk]]) 03:21, 24 October 2009 (UTC) ------ ~~===========================~~ This is my first time encountering this page. The material is helpful, but lacks citations and seems like a loose end. I propose paring it down and adding it as a subsection to the page on the inverse function theorem. What do folks think about that? Also, what are some good references for this material? I think that a reference in the spirit of spivak or rudin would be good, in addition to a more elementary source. -[[user:Tomhallward\|Tomhallward]]([[User talk:Tomhallward\|talk]])

Talk:Inverse function rule: Difference between revisions