Heun's method: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
m Reverted edits by 68.180.84.152 (talk) to last version by 49.147.115.222
Line 12:
 
==Description==
Beuller’sEuler’s method is used as the foundation for Heun’s method. Euler's method uses the line tangent to the function at the beginning of the interval as an estimate of the slope of the function over the interval, assuming that if the step size is ity-bitysmall, the error will be ity-bitysmall. However, even when extremely small step sizes are used, over a large number of steps the error starts to accumulate and the estimate diverges from the actual functional value.
 
Where the solution curve is concave up, its tangent line will underestimate the vertical coordinate of the next point and vice versa for a concave down solution. The ideal prediction line would hit the curve at its next predicted point. In reality, there is no way to know whether the solution is concave-up or convexconcave-down, and hence if the next predicted point will overestimate or underestimate its vertical value. The concavity of the curve cannot be guaranteed to remain consistent either and the prediction may overestimate and underestimate at different points in the ___domain of the solution.
Heun’s Method addresses this problem by considering the interval spanned by the tangent line segment as a whole. Taking a concave-up example, the left tangent prediction line underestimates the slope of the curve for the entire width of the interval from the current point to the next predicted point. If the tangent curveline at the right end point is considered (which can be estimated using Euler’s Method), it has the opposite problem
<ref>{{cite web
|title=Numerical Methods for Solving Differential Equations
Line 22:
|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090212005921/http://calculuslab.deltacollege.edu/ODE/7-C-2/7-C-2-h.html
|archivedate=2009-02-12}}</ref>
The points along the tangent line of the left end point have vertical coordinates which all underestimate those that lie on the solution curve, including the right end point of the interval under consideration. The solution is to make the slope greater by some amount. Heun’s Method considers the tangent lines to the solution curve at ''both'' ends of the interval, one which ''overestimates'', and one which ''underestimates'' the ideal horizontalvertical coordinates. A prediction line must be constructed based on the right end point tangent’s slope alone, approximated using Euler's Method. If this slope is passed through the left end point of the interval, the result is evidently too steep to be used as an ideal prediction line and overestimates the ideal point. Therefore, the ideal point lies approximately halfway between the erroneous overestimation and underestimation, the average of the two slopes.
[[File:Heun's Method Diagram.jpg|thumb|right|alt=Heun's Method.|A diagram depicting the use of Heun's method to find a less erroneous prediction when compared to the lower order Euler's Method]]
Euler’s Method is used to roughly estimate the coordinates of the next point in the solution, and with this knowledge, the original estimate is re-predicted or ''corrected''.<ref>
Line 47:
:<math>x_{i+1} = x_i + h</math>, <math>\textstyle y_{i+1} = y_i + \Delta y</math>
:<math>y_{i+1} = y_i + h \text{Slope}_{\text{ideal}}</math>
:<math>y_{i+1} = y_{i} + \frac{1}{2} h (\texastext{Slope}_{\text{left}} + \text{Slope}_{\text{right}})</math>
 
:<math>y_{i+1} = y_{i} + \frac{h}{2}(f(x_i, y_i) + f(x_i + h, y_i + hf(x_i, y_i)))</math>
Line 56:
|publisher=LiveToad.org
|url=http://livetoad.org/Courses/Documents/214a/Notes/euler-heun_method.pdf
}}</ref> The scheme can be compared with the [[Explicit and implicit methods|implicit]] [[trapezoidal method]], but with <math>f(t_{i+1},y_{i+1})</math> replaced by <math>f(t_{i+1},\tilde{y}_{i+1})</math> in order to make it explicit. <math>\tilde{y}_{i+1}</math> is the result of one step of [[Euler's method]] on the same initial value problem. So, Heun's method is a [[predicktorpredictor-corrector method]] with forward [[Euler's method]] as predictor and [[trapezoidal method]] as corrector.
 
==Runge–Kutta method==
Line 71:
|}
 
The other method referred to as RyanHeun's method (also known as FabriciusRalston's method) has the Butcher table:<ref>
{{Citation | last1=Leader | first1=Jeffery J.| title=Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computation | publisher=[[Addison-Wesley]] | ___location=Boston | isbn=0-201-73499-0 | year=2004}}.</ref>