... but the clouds ...: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:12, 16 September 2018

Revision as of 22:35, 6 November 2018

Line 4:

==Title==

The title comes from a phrase from the last verse of [[W. B. Yeats|Yeats’sYeats's]] near-[[Solipsism|solipsist]] poem,

''[http://www.readprint.com/work-1615/William-Butler-Yeats The Tower]'':

Line 27:

“''The Tower'' is a work which discusses history and the past not only in terms of recollection but also as an entire complex of traces, remainders and legacies of which individual subjective memory is only one element.”<ref name="multiref1">Katz, D., ‘Mirror Resembling Screens: Yeats, Beckett and ''... but the clouds ...''’ in ''The Savage Eye / L'Oeil Fauve : New Essays on Beckett's Television Plays'' (Amsterdam; Atlanta, GA:Rodopi, 1995) (SBT; 4), p 83</ref>

“The painful, highly personal question raised by Yeats is: if the poet’s physical powers fail, if his vision and hearing are impaired, can the memory of the sensory world serve as a basis for poetry? Is memory alone capable of stimulating the creative act? … As he draws upon his memory, revisiting scenes both in his life and works, he comes to respond affirmatively to the pessimistic question first raised … The poet’s physical impairments, paradoxically, prove a blessing. Indeed, in the stanza from which Beckett derived his title, Yeats puts the real world in perspective, thereby reducing his own sense of loss.”<ref>Homan, S., ''Filming Beckett’s Television Plays: A Director’s Experience'' (Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1992), pp 67,68</ref> In a personal communication Beckett told Eoin O’Brien that this was one of Yeats’sYeats's greatest lines.<ref>O’Brien, E., ''The Beckett Country'' (Dublin: The Black Cat Press, 1986), p 352 n 7</ref>

But why this particular line from the poem? Is it to do with the nature of [[cloud]]s? “Clouds seem permanent but are ultimately impermanent; they cannot be touched, yet can be seen; they are nothing more than condensed water, yet remain a [[symbol]] of romance, of the imagination beyond practical measurement – they are, in a phrase, at once here and elsewhere.”<ref name="multiref2">Homan, S., ''Filming Beckett’s Television Plays: A Director’s Experience'' (Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1992), p 77</ref>

Line 39:

* M1 is the poet in his active mode in the world

* W is his [[muse]] or the principle of poetry as it mediates between the material and the imaginative worlds

* V is the poet’spoet's voice that comes from M or accompanies the movements of M1 and that searches for the heightened language prerequisite for poetry

===Stages===

Line 77:

We hear a voice and assume it belongs to the man we are looking at, at least it is his thoughts we hear. He is remembering the circumstances under which he has seen the woman in the past. While he remembers we see M1, his remembered/imagined self, go through the motions described, at least what little actually takes place in the circle of light. He changes his mind about what causes her to appear. At first he says, “When I thought of her…”<ref>Beckett, S., ''Collected Shorter Plays of Samuel Beckett'' (London: Faber and Faber, 1984), p 259</ref> but he realises that is inaccurate; the woman simply ''appears'' to him, and always at night. He goes over his routine, carefully starting from his return home after walking the roads since daybreak:<ref>Both in his biography of Beckett (''Damned to Fame'' p 634) and in a chapter within his book ''Frescoes of the Skull'' (p 261), James Knowlson draws a parallel with this man and the type of characters written by [[John Millington Synge|Synge]].</ref> he enters, goes to the closet and swaps his [[greatcoat]] and hat for a nightgown and cap, then he enters his sanctum and tries to summon her, always without joy, whereupon at dawn he dresses again and heads out on the road.

The voice lists the three instances listed above where the woman has appeared to him in the past. When he reaches the third one the camera cuts to the woman’swoman's face, “reduced as far as possible to eyes and a mouth”,<ref name="multiref4"/> which mouths silently along with the voice, “…clouds…but the clouds…of the sky…”<ref name="shorter plays page 261">Beckett, S., ''Collected Shorter Plays of Samuel Beckett'' (London: Faber and Faber, 1984), p 261</ref> The man then realises there is a fourth case, but not really a fourth ''{{linktext|per se}}'' because so much of the time, by far the greatest amount of the time, nothing happens, the woman never even appears.

Although from the opening scene it seems like he spends every night willing the woman to appear, this isn’t the case. Sometimes he grows weary and occupies himself with other things that are “more … rewarding, such as … [[cube root]]s”<ref name="shorter plays page 261" /> or sits absorbed with nothing – which he describes as a mine – like the man in ''[[Film (film)|Film]]''.

We see M1 prepare for the road again and leave. The voice says, “Right,” then the woman’swoman's face appears once more and the voice repeats the final four lines of Yeats’sYeats's poem. This time, however, the woman does not mouth the words. Her face dissolves, we are left with the man sitting at his invisible table where we began and everything fades to black.

==Interpretation==

Line 87:

In a number of other works Beckett has felt the need to split an individual into separate aspects of that character, e.g. ''[[Words and Music (play)|Words and Music]]'', where the writer, his words and his emotions are all represented by separate characters. “In ''... but the clouds ...'', however, Beckett is concerned not with fragments of the self, but the whole person. The [[protagonist]], M, sees himself whole, (as at the end of ''Film'') held in the light circle of the imagination … The action of ''... but the clouds ...'' consists of M reliving past experience with such intensity that he can see himself performing his daily routine.”<ref>Pountney, R., ''Theatre of Shadows: Samuel Beckett’s Drama 1956-1976'', p 204</ref>

The man is a poet, “caught in the writer’s trap, the expectation of [[Artistic inspiration|inspiration]].”<ref>Pountney, R., ''Theatre of Shadows: Samuel Beckett’s Drama'' 1956-1976 (Gerrards Cross: Colin Smythe, 1988), p 205</ref> The woman seems to be his muse. It may be Beckett is personifying her as a woman only in the abstract sense but it is just as likely, considering Beckett’sBeckett's most famous writer-character, ''[[Krapp's Last Tape|Krapp]]'', that she is also a lost love, a once-literal muse. Krapp’sKrapp's imagination is impotent though. M has not reached that stage. He is still having occasional flashes of inspiration. And this must have been very much how the seventy-year-old Beckett felt himself; writing was becoming increasing difficult for him. Either way, “although not quite a character, she is … both an object of desire and a force beyond desire.”<ref>Worth, K., ‘Women in Beckett’s Radio and Television Plays’ in Ben-Zvi, L., (Ed.) ''Women in Beckett: Performance and Critical Perspectives'' (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1992), p 242</ref>

Krapp sat at a real table and heard a real voice, albeit himself as a younger man. The man in ''... but the clouds ...'' sits at an invisible table unable to write. Everything he encounters is outside a circle of dim, suffused light. This gives the play a dreamlike quality, the circle of light becomes a kind of ‘no place’ where this daily ritual takes place. The only voice is the one inside his head. Even the roads take on an abstract quality; they are neither to nor from anywhere unlike the travel options in ''[[Cascando]]'', for example.

Not all of Krapp’sKrapp's actions take place at his table, we hear him pouring drinks and attempting to sing in the darkness surrounding his stage as a means of distracting himself from the task in hand; in ''Quad'', the players’ only reality is within the lighted square as is the case with the women of ''[[Come and Go]]'' but in ''... but the clouds ...'' all the real action takes place in the darkness, the central circle of light is a place of transition only.

The fact that the woman may well have been real, rather than some [[Stereotype|stereotypical]] projection of M’sM's ideal woman, is suggested by the line, “With those unseeing eyes I so begged ''when alive'' to look at me.”<ref>Beckett, S., ''Collected Shorter Plays of Samuel Beckett'' (London: Faber and Faber, 1984), p 260</ref> The camera focuses on the woman’swoman's face while these lines are spoken. IEric Brater argues that "what he longs for is not the beloved but the image of his beloved, the evocative [[metaphor]] he has made of her. His is an exquisite despair. In his secret ceremony Beckett’s male figure all but revels in it."<ref>Brater, E. in Ben-Zvi, (Ed.) ‘Studies in the Theatre: Samuel Beckett Issue’ ''ASSAPH'' 17-18, 2003, p 193</ref> Because the old man realises he cannot physically recall his beloved, he makes do with [[simulation]]; he torments himself with memories of what it was like when she came before. M is not only trying to remember, he is trying "to remember the way in which he used to remember."<ref name="multiref1"/>

“For Beckett and for Yeats, there is a difference between remembering and not remembering, but both writers remind us that not remembering does not necessarily equal forgetting. That which is not consciously 'remembered' by an individual can still return to impose itself is a variety of ways, one of which both Yeats and Beckett qualify as a kind of haunting.”<ref name="multiref1"/> This makes one viewer’sviewer's comment as to the nature of W all the more interesting when they call her “the character who appears but isn’t really there – she only gives the appearance of an appearance.”<ref name="multiref2"/>

The man is a poet but he is also – and unexpectedly – a [[mathematician]], a rational man. Numbers play a significant part in Beckett’sBeckett's works (particularly the number three as it was a favourite of [[Dante Alighieri|Dante’sDante's]]). “M’s addiction to numbers – the four cases, the reference to cube roots, the two [[Statistics|statistical]] possibilities given for the fourth case – [can be] explained as a defensive posture. M must know that the woman’s appearance is at [[Randomness|random]] and defies [[logic]]. His careful efforts to establish mathematically the exact and proper conditions for her appearance are merely an attempt to give order to an experience he knows, deep inside, is beyond rational [[measurement]] or [[prediction]].”<ref>Homan, S., ''Filming Beckett’s Television Plays: A Director’s Experience'' (Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1992), p 75</ref>

He would prefer that the woman appears when he thinks of her, that there should exist a clear correlation between conscious thought and realisation but his is not the case. He is forced to modify the theory he is testing acknowledging that the woman’swoman's face merely “appeared” and those appearances were always at night. By the end of the play “he has done all he can do, he is now at the mercy of [[Divine Providence|Providence]]. The woman will appear ''if'', pleased with his efforts, she decides to appear.”<ref>Homan, S., ''Filming Beckett’s Television Plays: A Director’s Experience'' (Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1992), p 76</ref> There is an element of ritual to the piece, another common element of Beckett’sBeckett's theatre. Perhaps it is the only way he can feel he can retain some element of control over – or at least involvement in – the process.

Eric Brater suggests that ''... but the clouds ...'' has more in common with Yeats than simply ''The Tower'':

Line 108:

::: Mrs Mallet: I saw her lips move.<ref>''The Collected Plays of W B Yeats'' (New York: Macmillan, 1966), p 385</ref>

“As [[Katharine Worth]] has pointed out, in Yeatsian terminology ‘shades’ [the final word of Yeats’sYeats's poem] necessarily conjures up thoughts of [[spirit]]s or [[ghost]]s along with the onset of evening, and Beckett’sBeckett's play only reinforces this somewhat understated {{linktext|nuance}}.”<ref name="multiref1"/> The prevalence of ‘ghosts’ in Beckett’sBeckett's later writings hardly needs commenting on.<ref>See Fraser, G., ‘No More Than Ghosts Make: The Hauntology and Gothic Minimalism of Beckett's Late Work’ in ''MFS Modern Fiction Studies'' - Volume 46, Number 3, Fall 2000, pp. 772-785</ref>

[[John Calder]] in his review of the three plays shown on BBC2 had this to say about ''... but the clouds ...'':