Revision as of 08:25, 9 November 2018 edit SMcCandlish (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 203,717 edits more specific cat. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:06, 9 November 2018 edit undo SMcCandlish (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 203,717 edits →See also: +1 Next edit →
Line 78: * [[WP:Dictionaries as sources]] (essay) * [[WP:Frequently misinterpreted sourcing policy]] (essay; a bullet list of sourcing mistakes) * [[WP:Sources – SWOT analysis]] (essay; a four-criterion comparison of primary, secondary, and tertiary sources)▼ * [[WP:Party and person]] (essay; distinctions between terms like "tertiary" and "third party") ▲* [[WP:Sources – SWOT analysis]] (essay; a four-criterion comparison of primary, secondary, and tertiary sources) * [[WP:Tertiary-source fallacy]] (essay; advancing a tertiary source as if it ends all argument is a mistake) * [[WP:You are probably not a lexicologist or a lexicographer]] (essay: opinions about word usage do not trump reliable sources on language) * [[Template:Tertiary source inline]] (used outside {{tag\|ref}})

Wikipedia:Identifying and using tertiary sources: Difference between revisions