Revision as of 05:15, 26 February 2016 edit Cyberbot II (talk \| contribs) Bots, Pending changes reviewers 469,754 edits Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:46, 18 November 2018 edit undo Ethanpet113 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,478 edits →Rewrite: Yep looks pretty COI Next edit →
Line 32: :{{Ping\|AlexHajnal}} Agreed. Until the rewrite happens, I think [[WP:STUBIFY]] is appropriate. -- [[user:intgr\|intgr]] <small>[[user talk:intgr\|[talk]]]</small> 08:23, 25 November 2015 (UTC) :: Agreed. — [[User:Dsimic\|Dsimic]] ([[User talk:Dsimic#nobold\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Dsimic\|contribs]]) 08:26, 25 November 2015 (UTC) :{{Ping\|AlexHajnal}}'''Draftify'''? It appears to have been written like an advert by vendors of "in-memory" database technology(UNDECLARED [[WP:COI]]), and doesn't really explain why it's technically better (which would basically be for operations that need big matrices and clusters that will be read entirely and more than once (otherwise classic read on demand kind of databases would be adequate). I have marked it appropriately. Should it be moved to draft space?[[User:Ethanpet113\|Ethanpet113]] ([[User talk:Ethanpet113\|talk]]) 08:46, 18 November 2018 (UTC) == External links modified ==

Talk:In-memory processing: Difference between revisions