Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Convert's Cognitive Development Framework: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 36:
*'''Delete'''. This reads as an essay. If it's moved to draft, I suspect it would need a total rewrite (i.e. [[WP:TNT]]).
:I'm mystified at {{U|Legacypac}}'s coment, ''the best way to deal with this draft was expose it to other editors in mainspace''. Surely, if AfC is not cleanup, then moving a draft to mainspace isn't cleanup either. -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 03:18, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
::If there is no clear cut reason to decline a draft intended for mainspace, there is no problem exposing it to more editors. Some pages get greatly expanded and improved while others end up deleted after a wider review. This is one of those edge cases where a single AfC reviewer is not well placed to decide the fate of the page for all time. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 03:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
| |||