Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Convert's Cognitive Development Framework: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 37:
:I'm mystified at {{U|Legacypac}}'s coment, ''the best way to deal with this draft was expose it to other editors in mainspace''. Surely, if AfC is not cleanup, then moving a draft to mainspace isn't cleanup either. -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 03:18, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
::If there is no clear cut reason to decline a draft intended for mainspace, there is no problem exposing it to more editors. Some pages get greatly expanded and improved while others end up deleted after a wider review. This is one of those edge cases where a single AfC reviewer is not well placed to decide the fate of the page for all time. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 03:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' but perhaps move to the creator's name. His work is clearly gaining traction and is in use, so the title is a logical redirect to his name for now. Racadicalization remains an important topic in national security. Evidently this theory is an attempt to understand it. I don't see how this is [[WP:OR]] since the page creator did not make this up, just collected material about where the topic is discussed, same as any other good page. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 03:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
| |||