|
}}
__TOC__
== Closing RFC ==
Hi, you misunderstood Roberts intention,
he argued to close the discussion in the NPOV notice board (80 km long discussion) with no consensus, not that RFC with two maps, where we voted the map to be included to the article and everybody accepted it finally (anyway the majority voted yes for inclusion, without any doubt, only two were no, (7-2) but they have to accept the community decision, so it cannot be no consensus). Recently, discussions were only made about what we should write in text under it (the illegitimate trials of the disruptive editor by WP:AN3 was discussed and finally we did not had to took the case into the ANI). Check please also recent edits and the discussions, only the text under was modifided recently, but it has no connection to the inclusion of the map. Please correct your mistake ASAP. This you should have been closed: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Origin_of_the_Romanians_Article]. Thanks([[User:KIENGIR|KIENGIR]] ([[User talk:KIENGIR|talk]]) 22:02, 26 November 2018 (UTC))
: "The discussion at NPOVN appears to be just going on and on, and I would suggest that it be closed as No Consensus."
: "Please have the discussion at NPOVN closed as No Consensus"
-> This were what Robert referred, not the RFC Two maps, where the inlcusion was accepted!!([[User:KIENGIR|KIENGIR]] ([[User talk:KIENGIR|talk]]) 22:05, 26 November 2018 (UTC))
::Thank you for closing the RfC. I would also like to understand why you concluded that there was no consensus, taking into account that seven editors supported the proposal and only two editors opposed it. [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] ([[User talk:Borsoka|talk]]) 01:14, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
:::{{reply to|Borsoka|KIENGIR}} closure reverted. Apologies. [[User:ProgrammingGeek|'''<span style="color:Green">Programming</span><span style="color:Orange">Geek</span>''']][[User talk:ProgrammingGeek|<sup><span style="color:Green"> talk</span><span style="color:Orange">to</span>me</sup>]] 04:12, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
:::::Thank you for your action. I wonder why did not you choose to close it properly? I mean in accordance with the opinion of the vast majority of the editors. [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] ([[User talk:Borsoka|talk]]) 04:48, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
::::::ProgrammingGeek, thank you, of course! As per [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]]'s next question, I would ask the same...
::::::I'd say a proper closure would be like "The result was for the map inclusion, regarding the text written under it mostly people agreed on the version "Earliest mentions of Romanian settlements in official documents in the Kingdom of Hungary (between 1200 and 1400)" which may be expanded by another consensus" or similar.([[User:KIENGIR|KIENGIR]] ([[User talk:KIENGIR|talk]]) 12:46, 27 November 2018 (UTC))
== Talk:Mike Onoja ==
| 