Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
m I just edited the syntax of certain sentences. |
||
Line 1:
{{For|the topic in population genetics|Overlapping generations}}
The OLG model is the natural framework for the study of: (a) the
== History ==
Line 46 ⟶ 44:
*The old in period t own the entire capital stock and consume it entirely, so dissaving by the old in period t is given by N<sub>t-1</sub><sub>,</sub>a<sub>1</sub><sub>,</sub><sub>t-1</sub> = K<sub>t</sub>.
*Labor and capital markets are perfectly competitive and the aggregate production technology is CRS, Y = F(K,L).
In Diamond's version of the model, individuals tend to save more than is socially optimal, leading to dynamic inefficiency. Subsequent work has investigated whether dynamic inefficiency is a characteristic in some economies<ref name="Mankiw89">{{cite news|title=Assessing Dynamic Efficiency: Theory and Evidence|author1=N. Gregory Mankiw|date=1 May 1989|journal=[[Review of Economic Studies]]|author2=Lawrence H. Summers|issue=1|volume=56|pages=1–19|doi=10.2307/2297746|author3=Richard J. Zeckhauser}}</ref> and whether government programs to transfer wealth from young to poor do reduce dynamic inefficiency{{Citation needed|date=November 2014}}.▼
=== The Two-Sector OLG Model ===
Line 53 ⟶ 49:
=== The OLG Model with Endogenous Fertility ===
Oded Galor and his co-authors develop OLG models where population growth is endogenously determined to explore: (a) the importance the narrowing of the gender wage gap
== Dynamic Inefficiency ==
Line 60 ⟶ 56:
Another attribute of OLG type models is that it is possible that 'over saving' can occur when capital accumulation is added to the model—a situation which could be improved upon by a social planner by forcing households to draw down their capital stocks.<ref name="Diamond65">{{cite journal | last1 = Diamond| first1 = Peter | authorlink=Peter Diamond| year=1965 |title= National debt in a neoclassical growth model | journal =[[American Economic Review]] | volume = 55| pages = 1126–1150 | issue = 5}}</ref> However, certain restrictions on the underlying technology of production and consumer tastes can ensure that the steady state level of saving corresponds to the [[Golden Rule savings rate]] of the [[Solow growth model]] and thus guarantee intertemporal efficiency. Along the same lines, most empirical research on the subject has noted that oversaving does not seem to be a major problem in the real world.{{Citation needed|date=May 2012}}
▲In Diamond's version of the model, individuals tend to save more than is socially optimal, leading to dynamic inefficiency. Subsequent work has investigated whether dynamic inefficiency is a characteristic in some economies<ref name="Mankiw89">{{cite news|title=Assessing Dynamic Efficiency: Theory and Evidence|author1=N. Gregory Mankiw|date=1 May 1989|journal=[[Review of Economic Studies]]|author2=Lawrence H. Summers|issue=1|volume=56|pages=1–19|doi=10.2307/2297746|author3=Richard J. Zeckhauser}}</ref> and whether government programs to transfer wealth from young to poor do reduce dynamic inefficiency{{Citation needed|date=November 2014}}.
A third fundamental contribution of OLG models is that they justify existence of money as a medium of exchange. A system of expectations exists as an equilibrium in which each new young generation accepts money from the previous old generation in exchange for consumption. They do this because they expect to be able to use that money to purchase consumption when they are the old generation.<ref name="LjungqvistSargent2004"/>▼
▲
==See also==
|