Content deleted Content added
m link repair (You can help!) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1:
[[Media:Example.ogg]][[Media:Example.ogg]][[Media:Example.ogg]]Business and technology alignment, or just '''technology alignment''', corrects terminology and assumptions used in business to better match those of technology and standards anticipated in the [[technology strategy]] and so-called [[technology roadmap]]s.
=== Changes terminology ===▼
When technology is changing very rapidly in an industry, the aligning of business terms to the distinctions that the technology requires tends to dominate any [[enterprise taxonomy]] development effort. In such circumstances, [[consultant]]s or specific technology training is usually required, as the organization lacks the internal skills or experience with the technologies that it expects to be using soon.▼
▲''''''[[[[[[=== Changes terminology ===
▲When technology is changing very rapidly in an industry, the aligning of business terms to the distinctions that the technology requires tends to dominate any [[enterprise taxonomy]] development effort. In such circumstances, [[consultant]]s or specific technology training is usually required, as the organization lacks the internal skills or experience with the technologies that it expects to be using soon.]]]]]]''''''
=== Example: government ===
In [[government]], for example, citizen use of the [[Internet]] and the increased availability of [[telework]]ers has presented special challenges and opportunities, typically called "[[e-government]]". At the same time, internal operational efficiencies have become more of a priority due to rising competition between jurisdictions. Often the first step is to limit the number of different departments or agencies involved. By "consolidating the technology operations of 91 state agencies into the [[Virginia Information Technology Agency]], the State of Virginia estimates an eventual savings of nearly $100 million a year." - [http://cpr.ca.gov/report/cprrpt/issrec/stops/it/so01.htm#6b]
| |||