Content deleted Content added
→Rename to "Containers"?: rm empty section created as part of move request |
Move the RM talk into chron order (i.e. at end) |
||
Line 44:
: Well, this is indeed a serious oversimplification, but still a chroot() was a precursor to the modern containers technology, like a horse "powered" vehicle was a precursor to the modern car. --[[User:K001|K001]] ([[User talk:K001|talk]]) 22:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
== Requested move 5 February 2019 ==▼
{{requested move/dated|Container (computing)}}▼
[[:Operating-system-level virtualization]] → {{no redirect|Container (computing)}} – "Container" is the more common term today and is more "intuitively understandable" than "operating system–level virtualization". [[User:Qzekrom|Qzekrom]] ([[User talk:Qzekrom|talk]]) 02:19, 5 February 2019 (UTC)▼
This comment came with the template. Original discussion below this line ↓▼
----▼
I propose to rename the page to "Containers" or "Containers technology" or "Containerization" or something similar. The thing is, "Operating system-level virtualization" is quite long, complex and not definitive. Containers, on the other hand, is intuitively understandable. --[[User:K001|K001]] ([[User talk:K001|talk]]) 22:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)▼
Or Jails due FreeBSD started this on 2000 and SUN containers was implemented on 2005. Is good as is "Operating system-level virtualization" <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/62.106.50.48|62.106.50.48]] ([[User talk:62.106.50.48|talk]]) 09:31, 18 June 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->▼
→ → → Giving this a Bump....Would be good to rename, especially given the increased container notoriety within the entire industry - not just admins (TY Docker, Rkt, Mesos, Kub, etc) which is leading to significant confusion associated with full virtualization (VMWare/Hyper-V). [[User:DanSpurling|DanSpurling]] ([[User talk:DanSpurling|talk]]) 16:10, 13 October 2016 (UTC)▼
: I agree with this. "Container" seems to be the most popular name for this technology by far. [[User:Qzekrom|Qzekrom]] ([[User talk:Qzekrom|talk]]) 02:12, 5 February 2019 (UTC)▼
* '''Move over [[Container (virtualization)]]''', which redirects to it. The proposed title fails [[WP:PRECISE]]: we have [[Container (computer science)]] as a redirect to [[Container (abstract data type)]], which also has redirects [[Container class]], [[Container object]], and [[Container (programming)]]. There is also [[Container Linux by CoreOS|Container Linux]]. [[Special:Contributions/94.21.238.64|94.21.238.64]] ([[User talk:94.21.238.64|talk]]) 05:21, 5 February 2019 (UTC)▼
== add KVM? ==
Line 184 ⟶ 164:
HP-UX Containers (formerly known as Secure Resource Partitions) https://h20392.www2.hpe.com/portal/swdepot/displayProductInfo.do?productNumber=HP-UX-SRP are the HP-UX OS-level virtualization technology and the counterpart to Solaris zones and AIX WPARs (Workload Partitions). <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/157.203.176.133|157.203.176.133]] ([[User talk:157.203.176.133#top|talk]]) 14:09, 10 December 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
▲== Requested move 5 February 2019 ==
▲{{requested move/dated|Container (computing)}}
▲[[:Operating-system-level virtualization]] → {{no redirect|Container (computing)}} – "Container" is the more common term today and is more "intuitively understandable" than "operating system–level virtualization". [[User:Qzekrom|Qzekrom]] ([[User talk:Qzekrom|talk]]) 02:19, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
▲This comment came with the template. Original discussion below this line ↓
▲----
▲I propose to rename the page to "Containers" or "Containers technology" or "Containerization" or something similar. The thing is, "Operating system-level virtualization" is quite long, complex and not definitive. Containers, on the other hand, is intuitively understandable. --[[User:K001|K001]] ([[User talk:K001|talk]]) 22:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
▲Or Jails due FreeBSD started this on 2000 and SUN containers was implemented on 2005. Is good as is "Operating system-level virtualization" <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/62.106.50.48|62.106.50.48]] ([[User talk:62.106.50.48|talk]]) 09:31, 18 June 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
▲→ → → Giving this a Bump....Would be good to rename, especially given the increased container notoriety within the entire industry - not just admins (TY Docker, Rkt, Mesos, Kub, etc) which is leading to significant confusion associated with full virtualization (VMWare/Hyper-V). [[User:DanSpurling|DanSpurling]] ([[User talk:DanSpurling|talk]]) 16:10, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
▲: I agree with this. "Container" seems to be the most popular name for this technology by far. [[User:Qzekrom|Qzekrom]] ([[User talk:Qzekrom|talk]]) 02:12, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
▲* '''Move over [[Container (virtualization)]]''', which redirects to it. The proposed title fails [[WP:PRECISE]]: we have [[Container (computer science)]] as a redirect to [[Container (abstract data type)]], which also has redirects [[Container class]], [[Container object]], and [[Container (programming)]]. There is also [[Container Linux by CoreOS|Container Linux]]. [[Special:Contributions/94.21.238.64|94.21.238.64]] ([[User talk:94.21.238.64|talk]]) 05:21, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
| |||