Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 February 4: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:05, 5 February 2019

Revision as of 21:10, 5 February 2019

Line 19:

*'''Keep as is''' "controversies" is a broader category that includes hesitancy as well as political and other controversies, While I would not be entirely against having [[:Category:Vaccine hesitancy]], changing [[:Category:Vaccine controversies]] to [[:Category:Vaccine hesitancy]] would be more than just a rename. [[User:Tornado chaser|Tornado chaser]] ([[User talk:Tornado chaser|talk]]) 20:38, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

:: Except that most of them are not controversies, hence the consensus to move, e.g. MMR autism controversy and vaccine controversies to titles that do not include the suggestion they are controversies. Example: [[California Senate Bill 277]] is not a vaccine controversy, it's health legislation prompted by [[vaccine hesitancy]]. [[CEASE therapy]] is not a vaccine controversy, it is a form of quackery founded on bogus claims of a link between  [[MMR vaccine and autism]]. [[Jacobson v. Massachusetts]] is not a vaccine controversy, it's a ruling on [[mandatory vaccination]]. The name "controversies" is grossly misleading. And the decisive argument is that the parent article is no longer called vaccine controversies, but [[vaccine hesitancy]]. Your routine contrarianism on anti-vaccine article notwithstanding, this is blindingly obvious. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 21:01, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

* '''Keep'''. Not all of the articles are directly related to vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine controversies covers other forms of vaccine quackery. [[User:Natureium|Natureium]] ([[User talk:Natureium|talk]]) 21:09, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

==== Category:Biodiversity hotspots ====