Revision as of 22:36, 5 February 2019 edit Tornado chaser (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 23,868 edits →Category:Vaccine controversies ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:10, 6 February 2019 edit undo JzG (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 155,521 edits →Category:Vaccine controversies: r Next edit →
Line 21: ::: While a bill itself cannot be a controversy, there was most definitely controversy regarding SB 277, and court cases like [[Jacobson v. Massachusetts]] are obviously controversial. [[User:Tornado chaser\|Tornado chaser]] ([[User talk:Tornado chaser\|talk]]) 22:35, 5 February 2019 (UTC) * '''Keep'''. Not all of the articles are directly related to vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine controversies covers other forms of vaccine quackery. [[User:Natureium\|Natureium]] ([[User talk:Natureium\|talk]]) 21:09, 5 February 2019 (UTC) :: And most of them are not related in any way to controversies. <b>[[User Talk:JzG\|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help\|Help!]])</small> 09:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC) ==== Category:Biodiversity hotspots ====

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 February 4: Difference between revisions