Content deleted Content added
Would be too promotional and too detailed for lede |
Some thoughts on lede. |
||
Line 20:
* Added 2nd paragraph in the lede outlining Oracle's support for OLTP workloads, DW workloads, and mixed OLTP/DW workloads. [[User:Ccraft us|Ccraft us]] ([[User talk:Ccraft us|talk]]) 20:40, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
* As written the first strike out is too promotional. The second paragraph strike out is also too detailed for the lede (even the remaining lede is too detailed). Don't worry editing my text on the workpage. Even the existing lede is too detailed. This is all my opinion, others opinion may be different.[[User:Djm-leighpark|Djm-leighpark]] ([[User talk:Djm-leighpark|talk]]) 23:01, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
* A thought in passing. I again will comment on my views about what should be it in the lede. In my opinion It is needs to suitable for say a person in a call center or accounts who hears there system runs on an Oracle database and looks it up on Wikipedia. That means minimum technicality. It doesn't need to satisfy softies/technies as they are expected to read the index. What may be useful is a paragraph differential how Oracle Databases uses the term database in the sense MySQL and SQL Server use 'Server'; whilst those products use database in a sense somewhat akin to an Oracle Database Schema; this being a useful point to have in the lede.[[User:Djm-leighpark|Djm-leighpark]] ([[User talk:Djm-leighpark|talk]]) 17:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
{{talk-reflist}}
| |||