Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doublefuck programming language: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
good idea |
|||
Line 23:
**Yes, it is an example of the nerd bias you've heard about :) [[User:Wyss|Wyss]] 04:20, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
*'''Merge and redirect''' not different enough to be 2 articles. The command table from doublefuck can replace the command table in brainfuck. [[User:DCEdwards1966|DCEdwards1966]] 22:01, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC)
**Good suggestion. This reduces clutter without making the information any harder to find or understand. Still no vote. [[User:Andrewa|Andrewa]] 15:44, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
*Fancruft. '''Delete''' (preferably) or '''merge and redirect'''. [[User:Kosebamse|Kosebamse]] 22:02, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Brainfuck is just barely notable as a well-known joke in its field. This is not. --[[User:Korath|Korath]][[User talk:Korath|<sup>会話</sup>]] 22:19, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
| |||