Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 January 21: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Category:American labor unionists: Comment |
Richhoncho (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 55:
::Because I haven't looked at every other one. I said it should be reviewed - maybe all of them should be deleted or maybe just a few; in the meantime, I came across this one, felt it should be deleted and decided to nominate it. <span style="color:blue">Star</span><span style="color:orange">cheers</span><span style="color:green">peaks</span><span style="color:red">news</span>lost<span style="color:blue">wars</span><sup>[[User talk:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars|Talk to me]]</sup> 06:53, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. Perhaps if this is deleted it'll encourage one of the editors who specialise in multi-category CFDs to do a CFD for other similar categories. <b>[[User:DexDor|DexDor]]</b><sup> [[User talk:DexDor|(talk)]]</sup> 21:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
*'''Delete.''' Two points. Firstly taking this particular category, it's just another list of 'John Fogerty albums' it's not particularly useful or informative. For all we know Fogerty might have employed an arranger to write out arrangements, or the band just jammed until they (or Fogerty) was happy with the result. It is also possible Fogerty worked all the parts out and hummed them to the band (as per Rafferty's Baker Street), but without the evidence this particular category should be deleted.
:Second Point, With regard to the tree, many of the categories relate to people who were arrangers, '''not''' songwriters, not performers and not producers, back in the day when arrangers meant something different and special (even if their pay was lower!). I mention this, because I most certainly don't think the tree should be deleted, but like this particular category, some sub-cats might need pruning back. --[[User:Richhoncho|Richhoncho]] ([[User talk:Richhoncho|talk]]) 17:05, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
| |||