Revision as of 09:10, 4 March 2019 edit Tedickey (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 54,941 edits comment ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:31, 6 March 2019 edit undo Llywrch (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 81,563 edits response Next edit →
Line 336: :Actually, the ''proper approach'' would be to follow the Wikipedia guidelines. I don't see any clue in your comments regarding the [[WP:RS\|reliable sources]] which you would use for the suggested changes. [[User:Tedickey\|TEDickey]] ([[User talk:Tedickey\|talk]]) 09:10, 4 March 2019 (UTC) :: If you're addressing me, Wikipedia guidelines would be to indent a bit more. Otherwise, it appears you're addressing Krushia. But {{u\|Tedickey}}, what do ''you'' consider a reliable source? Proscriptions made that are not necessarily followed? Manuals of operating systems? Handbooks published by O'Reilly? Lists of utilities collected in .deb or .rpm packages? (I forget what the equivalent would be for BSD; it's been a few years since I worked with FreeBSD.) -- [[User:Llywrch\|llywrch]] ([[User talk:Llywrch\|talk]]) 07:31, 6 March 2019 (UTC) == commands vs. programs & standards ==

Template talk:Unix commands: Difference between revisions